PLAN COMMISSION
July 26, 2007
Members present: Breault, Burchill, Yoerg, Mailloux and Caruso
Others present: Terry and Linda Walker, John Klingelhutz, Paul Mollett, Robert Simonson, Tim Erickson, Angela Popenhagen, John Gelderman, Michelle Caron, Ron Clark, Michael and Betty Breske, Rod Stickney, Michael O’Connell, Charles Ellefson, Denny Darnold and others.
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
Motion by Yoerg, seconded by Mailloux to
approve the 7/12/07 meeting minutes.
Motion carried.
Request to vacate or
discontinue the unimproved right-of-way of
Darnold noted that the Common Council will need to schedule and conduct a hearing regarding this request prior to taking formal action. The hearing would most likely be held in late September.
Motion by Yoerg, seconded by Burchill to
recommend that the unimproved right-of-way of
Final development
plans for the
The plans do not include the sanitary sewer extension / off-site improvements, and the city will reserve the right to review those proposed improvements.
Page 2, Plan Commission
July 26, 2007
Darnold asked Angela Popehagen (project engineer) if the recommendations of the city engineer are of any concern. Popenhagen noted that issues raised by the city engineer will be addressed and the plans revised accordingly.
Motion by Burchill, seconded by Caruso to
recommend approval of the final development plans for the
Request by
Klingelhutz Companies to amend the conditional use permit to allow the 40 unit
Vista Canyon residential condominium development to be converted to a 55 unit
assisted living – residential care apartment complex (RCAC) and the proposed
(second building) of the Vista Canyon development to be developed as a 65 unit
assisted care facility – (for discussion only).
John Klingelhutz stated that the
Simonson stated he is from
Simonson noted that there are two facilities in the city of
Simonson explained the general concept of a RCAC is to allow residents to age in place with services being increased as needed. Many residents that occupy this type of facility are 80 to 85 years of age. A RCAC is not age limited and occupants may be less than 55 years of age, but may only occupy the facility if services are needed. RCACs do not require the high level of regulation that a nursing home does require, thus a RCAC is a less expensive alternative. Nurses are on staff about 60 to 80 hours per week and on call the balance of the time. Simonson presented a comparison of an unregulated congregate senior housing facility, a RCAC and a CBRF.
Simonson stated he has reviewed the cost to convert and
operate a 55 unit RCAC at this location with the potential for rent income and
stated that he believes this economically feasible. Simonson explained that in other
Page 3, Plan Commission
July 26, 2007
been able to participate in the
county family care programs and that
Breault asked if there is market research to support the
need for this type of facility. He also
noted that the city of
Yoerg asked about the licensing consideration and what may occur which would place this type of facility at jeopardy of losing a license. Simonson noted that he immediately addresses any concern that the licensing authority has and that there are no outstanding fines or issues at any of his other facilities.
Yoerg felt that the request warrants further review. Darnold commented that if Klingelhutz and Simonson desire to pursue the RCAC concept it would require a public hearing and an opportunity for the public to comment would be provided. Breault stated he felt the city would only consider the conversion of the 40 unit existing building to a 55 unit care facility at this time and if the additional units are warranted that the city will review that issue in the future. Klingelhutz agreed to that consideration.
Rod Stickney stated he is concerned that Klingelhutz can’t sell the existing residential condo units because they were not motivated to sell. Stickney commented that he tried to contact them to purchase a unit and did not receive a call back.
Michael O’Connell encouraged cooperation with the developer
and asked if Klingelhutz would be willing to meet with members of the
homeowners associations to discuss issues that they may have including
potential use of the
No action was taken.
Petition
for annexation of 54.41 acres east of Carmichael Rd. and north of I-94 – Rock
Island Land Company and Double Play Investments. Darnold commented that it
was his intent to review the issues that the plan commission wants to be reviewed
by the city staff. John Gelderman, Opus
explained that they have looked at this area for potential development since
January, 2007; that the parcels are generally oriented in a U shape surrounding
residential parcels on three sides.
Discussions with city and WisDOT staff directed the primary access to
the site to be located at the joint access to the golf course and Culvers. Darnold noted that it is WisDOT directive to
have the primary access approximately 1,320 feet north of the
Page 4, Plan Commission
July 26, 2007
Mailloux asked about the comprehensive plan status. Darnold responded that was put on hold as the plan commission and Common Council addressed the downtown redevelopment issues. Mailloux asked how much commercial development the city may be able to support.
Yoerg expressed that the entire
Yoerg commented that
Breault urged the plan commission to review the options of
development from I-94 to
Yoerg noted that the wastewater treatment plant capacity is a significant issue.
John Gelderman offered that Opus may be able to provide some
assistance to the city in reviewing the development issues along the
Yoerg expressed concern that the residential properties to the east would need to drive through a commercial development to get to the residences.
The issue of future development in the
No action was taken.
Motion by Caruso, seconded by Yoerg to adjourn. Motion carried. 8:17 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Dennis Darnold, Secretary