CITY OF HUDSON COMMON COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES OF MONDAY, MAY 18, 2009

 

 

     Meeting called to order by Mayor Dean Knudson in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:00 p.m.  Mayor Knudson led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

     PRESENT:  Mayor Knudson and Alderpersons Randy Morrissette, Pam Brokaw, Lori Bernard, Lee Wyland, Scot O’Malley and Alan Burchill.

 

     OTHERS PRESENT:  Cathy Munkittrick, Devin Willi, Marty Jensen, Dennis Darnold, Steve Wilcox, Tom Smith, Mark Putman, Charles Huntley, Scott Holmes, Robert Muchlinski, Randy Hanson, Mike Weyers, John Andrews, Carl Meincke, Pat Casanova, Dave Krupich, Chuck Schwartz, Mitch Klein, Priscilla Wyeth, Bob Gootwassink, Michael Brandt, several youth and adult members of the Boy Scouts of America, and others.

 

     COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT:  Priscilla Wyeth, 611 Twelve Oaks Lane, Hudson, was present representing the Rise and Shine Toastmasters.  She indicated that the club was celebrating twenty years in the community providing professional growth and training.  Mayor Knudson requested that Wyeth read a proclamation that he would sign proclaiming May 2009 as Hudson Rise and Shine Toastmaster’s month.

 

     Mayor Knudson called for other comments or suggestions. None were given.

 

     CONSENT AGENDA:  MOTION by Bernard, second by O’Malley to approve the following Consent Agenda items:

 

MINUTES:  Approve the Public Hearing and Regular Meeting minutes of 5/4/09, Annual and Special Meeting Minutes of 5/6/09.

 

CLAIMS:  Approve the following claims for payment:

 

FUND

DESCRIPTION

PAYABLES

PAYROLL

TOTALS

100

General

135,059.70

126,101.06

261,160.76

450

Capital Projects

7,092.73

0.00

7,092.73

610

Sewer

29,971.50

10,018.30

39,989.80

620

Parking

2,123.79

1,138.54

3,262.33

630

Ambulance

4,793.97

7,228.23

12,022.20

 

TOTALS

179,041.69

144,486.13

323,527.82

 

CONSIDER PAY ADJUSTMENT FOR POLICE PATROL OFFICER:  Approve the pay adjustment for Police Patrol Officer Hilary Lundberg to the one year pay scale at her six month anniversary date, and to the three year pay scale when she reaches her one year anniversary.

 

APPLICATION OF SCOTT FURLONG FOR AMUSEMENT DEVICE OWNER’S LICENSE AND PERMITS D/B/A LEISURE ENTERTAINMENT RW LLC:  Approve the issuance of an Amusement Device Owner’s License to Scott Furlong, N7010 820th Street, River Falls, WI d/b/a Leisure Entertainment RW LLC and issuance of Amusement Device Permits for the five machines located at Pudge’s Bar in Hudson.

 

DENY THE REQUEST OF LIMO ONE FOR A RESERVED PARKING SPACE IN FRONT OF AGAVE KITCHEN ON FRIDAY AND SATURDAY NIGHTS:  Deny the request of Limo One for a reserved parking space in front of Agave Kitchen on Friday and Saturday nights.

 

REQUEST TO USE LAKEFRONT PARK BANDSHELL FOR FITNESS DAY ON      SATURDAY, JUNE 20, 2009:  Approve the request of Eric and Dave Tostrud to hold Fitness Day in Lakefront Park on Saturday, June 20, 2009.

 

UPDATE TO EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK:  Approve the changes to the Employee Handbook regarding insurance in Chapter 9, Section 9, and     to Chapter 10 travel– meetings, as submitted.

 

REPORTS OF CITY OFFICIALS, BOARDS COMMISSIONS:  Place on file the quarterly report of the Water Department and the Joint Library Board minutes of 4/13/09.

 

Roll call vote:  Ayes (6).  MOTION CARRIED.

 

     FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR 20,600 SQUARE FOOT GOODWILL STORE AT 1621 COULEE ROAD, GOOTWASSINK REAL ESTATE LLC AND FENDLER-PATTERSON CONSTRUCTION:  

Denny Darnold indicated that the Plan Commission recommended approval with the condition noted on the documentation provided.  He further noted that he met with the City’s engineer and the project engineer and the plans had been amended as requested.  He introduced Bob Gootwassink, the developer, and Michael Brandt, the project engineer.

 

MOTION by Morrissette, second by Brokaw to approve the final development plans for the 20,600 sq. ft. Goodwill store at 1621 Coulee Road with the following conditions:

 

·         Provide “right of entry” documentation to inform the City that the property owner to the west is knowledgeable that the project will extend into the access easement area.

·         Provide an estimate of project costs to restore street, curb and gutter and boulevard areas where disturbed, and to cover the cost of the city engineer’s inspection staff (Bonestroo) time for required inspections at 1.25 X the estimated costs, and the provision of a letter of credit to assure the restoration and inspection costs to be provided at the time of application for a building permit.  The estimate of costs will be reviewed by the city engineer.

·         Plans to be amended per the city engineer’s comments of 5-7-09 except for the curb and gutter on 17th Street.

 

     Morrissette questioned whether installation of curb and gutter was practical, given potential future enhancements to the intersection.  Darnold noted that there would be internal curb and gutter now to deal with any runoff issues.  If a project is completed in the future, the need for curb, gutter, right hand turn lanes, signalization and other improvements would be considered, and some of these costs would be assessable. 

 

     Wyland asked if a traffic impact study had been done and what impact on traffic flow was anticipated.  Brandt stated that the traffic impact would be classified by the ITI traffic guidelines as low impact development.  Other similar stores don’t have significant impact, so he doesn’t anticipate a problem.

 

     Bernard discussed the traffic impact on the proposal.  She felt that the facility would have more traffic than the car dealership did.  She also noted that the easterly entrance onto Coulee Road could impact traffic flow on Coulee and 17th, especially if signalization occurs.  She asked whether a traffic study could be started and then the City could determine what impact the new business would have on the traffic flow.  She also suggested that the developer bear some of the cost of the study.  Darnold stated that he felt that the area was already known to have heavy vehicular flows and other traffic concerns and did not feel that the developer should be responsible for a study for an existing problem.

 

     O’Malley discussed the internal curb and gutter and rain water issues on the property and wanted to make sure the developers understood and were aware of this.  He also expressed concern for drivers eastbound on Coulee turning left into the lot so close to 17th Street, and suggested that the easterly drive be removed, and require entrance off of Coulee at the westerly entrance.  He felt that both driveways would make the problem at the intersection worse.

 

     Mayor Knudson reviewed the traffic flow issues and noted that they were also discussed at length at the Plan Commission.  The westerly entrance on Coulee would be utilized by a truck that comes once per week, and the easterly entrance was intended to be for regular traffic into the facility.  He concurred that this development wasn’t the cause of the ongoing traffic concerns.  Darnold noted that the property was zoned commercial and he felt it had a low traffic impact compared to certain types of commercial property.

 

     Council discussed possible options related to the driveways, traffic studies, and the possibility of returning it to the Plan Commission for further study.  Darnold indicated that another delay would likely hamper the completion of the development.

 

     MOTION by O’Malley, second by Wyland, to amend the motion and send the issue back to the Plan Commission to discuss the traffic issues reviewed during this meeting. 

 

     Burchill felt that the property currently was an eyesore and that this was an excellent opportunity for a new and improved facility.  He didn’t feel anything would be accomplished by delaying the project, and the issues related to traffic and safety were discussed at Plan Commission

 

     Project Engineer Brandt noted that the easterly driveway was intended to flow traffic to the front door of the facility and didn’t see that removal of the driveway would help traffic issues.  He stated they would be willing to consider a right-in, right-out entrance.  He also committed to provide escrow funds for future traffic or development issues as needed.  Mr. Brandt noted that people will always find the quickest way in and out of a commercial location.  He stated they were willing to work with the Council in the future to address issues.

 

     Wyland and Brandt discussed the location of the building on the property, potential future traffic patterns, tenants at the facility, and the willingness of the developer to address traffic issues in the future with the Council. Morrissette noted that the developer had performed due diligence in getting the project to this point.

 

     O’Malley asked the developer if a delay in sending the project back to the Public Safety Committee and Plan Commission would impact the project.  Gootwassink stated that they were planning on closing on May 19th and another delay would cause substantial problems with continuing the development.  A delay would also likely force the tenant away and he would lose that deal.  O’Malley asked if he understood the potential for changes to the entrances in the future.  Gootwassink responded that he understood and didn’t anticipate huge traffic or parking issues.

 

     The amendment to the original motion was RESCINDED by O’Malley.

 

     MOTION by Morrissette, second by Brokaw to amend the original motion to include a request that Darnold work with the developer concerning traffic related issues, and that notation be made that the City and the developer/builder understand that the City may be looking at possible changes to the driveway configuration in the future.  All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.

 

     The vote was then taken on the original motion to approve the final development plans.  All ayes (6-0).  MOTION CARRIED.

 

Consider ORDINANCE NO. 7-09 – an ordinance rezoning territory in the city of hudson extraterritorial zoning district:  Darnold noted that the public hearing and first reading of the ordinance occurred at the May 4, 2009, meeting.

 

motion by O’Malley, second by Burchill, to adopt the following:

 

ORDINANCE NO. 7-09

AN ORDINANCE REZONING TERRITORY IN THE CITY OF HUDSON

EXTRATERRITORIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

 (Copy on file in Clerk’s office)

 

     Morrissette expressed his opinion that the property should be in the City and be on City utilities, rather than using a well and septic system.  Mayor Knudson noted that a letter had been received from Town of Hudson resident Dolly Qualls discussing concerns about sewage issues and the impact on the groundwater.  Bernard noted that problem areas can occur on City water.  It was noted that treatment for pharmaceuticals in the groundwater is not in place in Wisconsin, and that with a sewer system in place, contaminants don’t seep into the ground.

 

     Mayor Knudson noted that a relatively large septic system was planned, and that the Plan Commission discussed concerns about this at their meetings.  Darnold said he was comfortable with the septic system being in place, as the City’s wells were very deep and not as subject to percolating.  The individual wells in the area were more likely to see contamination issues, if any were to exist.  Darnold also mentioned that the only action tonight was to rezone the property, and that the Town of Hudson and possibly the City would address further development issues as the project goes forward.

 

MOTION by Burchill, second by Bernard to call the question and end discussion.  Ayes (4); Morrissette and O’Malley voted no.  MOTION CARRIED.

 

The vote was then taken on adoption of Ordinance 7-09.  Ayes (5); Morrissette voted no.  MOTION CARRIED.

 

     APPLICATIONS FOR OPERATOR’S LICENSES:  Morrissette recused himself.  MOTION by Wyland, second by Bernard to approve the issuance of regular Operator’s Licenses for the period 5/19/09 to 6/30/11 to:

 

German Felipe Duran        806 Brentwood Circle       River Falls, WI

Jill LaRae Duran           806 Brentwood Circle       River Falls, WI

Sara Fuentes               745 Hallstrom Drive        Red Wing, MN

Robert N. Knefelkamp       1140 Helen Street N.       Hudson, WI

Kevin M. Peterson          4190 White Bear Parkway    White Bear Lake, MN

 

Ayes (5), MOTION CARRIED.

 

     APPLICATIONS FOR FIREWORKS PARAPHERNALIA SALE PERMITS    MOTION by    Wyland, second by Morrissette, to approve the issuance of Fireworks Paraphernalia Sales Permits for sales dates of June 15, 2009 to July 7, 2009 at the following locations, contingent on attending the mandatory meeting, and that staff begin the process to amend the ordinance:

 

     Fleet Farm                 1101 Industrial Street

     North Hudson Ventures      1800 Crest View Drive

     Target Store               2401 Coulee Road

     Wal-Mart Store             2222 Crest View Drive

     Freedom Valu Center        219 Second Street

     Freedom Valu Center        1917 Coulee Road

 

All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.

 

     AGREEMENT WITH HUDSON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR POLICE SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER:  Mayor Knudson noted that the Hudson School Board had forwarded a signed agreement to pay for two-thirds of the annual cost of the Police School Liaison officer through the end of 2010.  He noted that the City Attorney and the School District’s attorney had made some minor language adjustments to the agreement.

 

MOTION by Morrissette, second by Brokaw, to approve the Intergovernmental Agreement Police-School Liaison Program between the City of Hudson and the School District of Hudson.  All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.

 

     CONSIDER LEASE ADDENDUM WITH YOUTH ACTION HUDSON FOR ROOM IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING:  Brokaw recused herself.  MOTION BY Wyland, second by Bernard, to approve the lease addendum with Youth Action Hudson for space in the Municipal Building (Rooms 207 and 210) at 911 Fourth Street.  Ayes (5), MOTION CARRIED.  It was noted that the Youth Action Board still had to offer final approval of the agreement. 

 

     REQUEST OF AGAVE KITCHEN TO PROVIDE VALET PARKING:  MOTION by Morrissette, second by Wyland, to recommend approval of a valet parking service by Agave Kitchen, contingent upon Agave providing proof of insurance; a review of the service in 30 days from the May 18, 2009, Council meeting (July Public Safety Meeting); and a meeting with the City Clerk to determine if the service was considered a new business and would need to comply with any requirements.  Brief discussion was held on the request and the need for approval by the City.  All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.

 

     PLACEMENT OF STATUE IN LAKEFRONT PARK AS PROPOSED BY THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA:  MOTION by Morrissette, second by Brokaw to approve the placement of a statue in Lakefront Park as proposed by the Boys Scouts of America (BSA), subject to the terms and requirements noted in the documentation provided to the Council, including the placement of the historic plaque and the maintenance agreement. 

 

     Mayor Knudson briefly reviewed the documentation that was submitted.  Brokaw inquired as to whom on city staff would be responsible for assuring that the BSA followed through on maintenance required in the documentation.  The agreement stated that the Director of Public Works and Parks would be responsible.  Steve Wilcox of the BSA noted that the BSA would establish responsibility for their required activities.  It was noted that the statue was a gift from the North Star Council.

 

     The Council agreed to hear limited additional comments on the proposal. 

 

     Tom Smith, 927 Third Street, and member of the Park Board, expressed his opposition to the statue as he did in the public hearing.  He commented on the representative from the North Star Council’s comments on the stance of the BSA toward certain individuals in society, and the representative’s statement about the statue only being installed in the North Star Council area were contradictory to the information on the BSA national website.  He expressed that the issue at hand wasn’t the BSA, but the location of a statue per the City’s policy.

 

     Mitch Klein, 1302 6th Street, noted that the focus seemed to be on the assumed discriminatory practices of the BSA; he also stated that the City had accepted a Blue Star banner from a group of mothers whose children were in military service.  He stated that this, too, was a private organization and the City had accepted this memorial and established precedence.


     Wilcox stated that he was available to answer any additional questions.  He noted that the BSA had worked with all due diligence and met the requests under the new policy, and he felt they had met and exceeded the requirements of the City.  Hearing no further questions, Mayor Knudson then opened discussion amongst the Council members.

 

     O’Malley stated his long support of and history with Hudson scouting and noted his leadership role in Troop 140.  He indicated, however, that he was present to represent the citizens of the Fifth (Aldermanic) District.  He stated that a majority of the citizens in his district had indicated their opposition to the statue.  He didn’t feel that the statue met the requirement of community approval.  He also briefly discussed an online poll in the Star-Observer and indicated that he would be voting against the location of the statue in Lakefront Park.

 

     Wyland noted different results from the online poll.  He stated that he had citizens in his district strongly in favor, as well as a few opposed.  As a former scout, he wasn’t aware of any discrimination or issues in this area.  He felt that although the BSA required national council policies as conditions of a local charter, local chapters had some flexibility in their interpretation of the charter.  He felt that the statue reflected the positive impact of scouting on the City of Hudson, and stated that the Council should focus on the local impact and not national issues.    

 

     Pat Casanova, President of the Park Board, was asked to give his thoughts on the project.  He noted that a majority of the Park Board felt this would be a commemoration of the fact that the scouts have been part of the fabric of the community for years and have contributed countless hours of volunteer time.  He noted that both the Park Board and Plan Commission approved the site for the statue.  

 

     Burchill stated that the Star-Observer poll was unscientific.  He stated that, in his opinion, the contributions made to the community by the scouts were unsurpassed, and that a positive vote for the statue didn’t diminish the social issues.

 

     Brokaw agreed that the BSA had helped and strengthened the community.

 

     Bernard stated that the statue didn’t have anything to do with national policies, and that the scouts were in the organization to learn leadership skills.  She noted that the statue could be addressed in ten years if issues arise.  She reported that she had mixed input in her district, but much of it was positive.  Morrissette agreed that this issue was outside of the national social issues. A brief discussion of the methodology of the Star-Observer online poll ensued.

 

     O’Malley stated that the issue was about the statue, not the BSA or the scouts themselves.

 

     Mayor Knudson noted that the City tried to allow as much time for input as possible, and that he wasn’t required to have a public hearing.  He felt the statue would be an attractive, positive addition to the City.  He noted that the BSA may have views that not everyone agrees with, but emphasized the values the group stands for, and the contributions that the BSA have made in Hudson and across the world.

 

     The vote was taken on the motion to approve the location and installation of the statue.  Ayes (5), O’Malley voted no.  MOTION CARRIED.

 

     UPDATE ON PROJECTS:  Bonestroo Engineer Chuck Schwartz provided an update on Carmichael Road; he noted that a meeting was scheduled for May 19th between the construction foreman and the City crew to address some traffic flow and movement issues in the construction area.  Council members noted concerns about the project, and Schwartz indicated that he would address them at the meeting.  2009 road improvements are being further reviewed to determine if any utility work should be done during the construction projects.

 

CONSIDER AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE, CH. 187-19, SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY – ORDINANCE NO. 6-09:  Mayor Knudson noted that the minor changes suggested at the last meeting had been made, and that the first reading of the ordinance had taken place at the May 4, 2009, meeting.

 

MOTION by Morrissette, second by Burchill, to adopt Ordinance No. 6-09.

 

     O’Malley requested that the Council consider a change in the ordinance in relation to the non-residency zones.  Darnold presented a map with the current non-residency zones noted.  Mayor Knudson noted that there was a link on the City website to a series of maps related to this issue.  O’Malley stated that the 250 foot limit was arbitrary and covered a substantial part of the City.  He felt that the zones as currently established would make it difficult for any future offender to find a place to live, and this might encourage them not to register.  He stated that there were six registered offenders currently in the City, and there had been no recurrences. 


     O’Malley suggested that the map be more closely reviewed, and to consider removing locations within the zones that don’t make sense.  Wyland concurred.  Bernard asked how the process of establishing the status of parcels would be accomplished.  Darnold stated that specific parcels could be established as in or out of the non-residency zones.  Morrissette felt that this was what the appeal process was for.  Munkittrick noted that areas could be established where the 250-foot non-residency rule wouldn’t apply.

 

     Mayor Knudson noted that a change from 250 to 200 feet would dramatically impact the non-residency zones.  He noted that Lakefront Park’s location eliminated a large number of rental units in the downtown area. 


     O’Malley stated that when an offender determines to move into a community, he or she does so for various reasons, including family ties, probation officers, or employment.  He expressed concern that placing too many limitations on where they live could drive them underground.  Darnold discussed areas within the community where rental units would and wouldn’t be in the residency restriction zone.

 

     Mayor Knudson stated that the City needed to utilize the past decisions by states and municipalities, in which there were court challenges, in determining what method would work best.  He asked about the legal defense of designating certain parcels as acceptable within residency restriction zones.  Munkittrick said that the selection of parcels could not be arbitrary, and that it would have to be clearly delineated why one parcel within a restricted zone was acceptable for residency and one was not.  She noted that municipalities with residency zones greater than 250 feet had been upheld, and that she understood O’Malley’s reasoning for balance.  O’Malley provided examples of commercial parcels in the downtown area with rentals upstairs that would not be restricted, yet have a high volume of youth who frequent the businesses.

 

     MOTION by O’Malley to amend the original motion and request that the Public Safety Committee work with Denny Darnold to work on residency zone options that would better fit with the desire to protect the children in the community. 

 

     Bernard asked if rental properties could be included on an updated map.  Discussion ensued about identifying all rental properties, but Darnold indicated that he and his staff could identify the bulk of them.

 

     Morrissette rescinded his original motion.

 

     Darnold indicated that the request for changes in the map could be available at the second meeting in June at the soonest.  Wyland suggested that a working session of interested parties take place prior to it being sent back to the Public Safety Committee.

 

     Burchill stated that he felt that the issue had been debated for months and that a vote on the ordinance should be taken.  He expressed concerns about the rationale that would be used to determine exceptions to the residency zones.

 

     Wyland provide a second to  O’Malley’s motion to forward the issue back to Public Safety.

 

     Vote was taken on the amendment to the motion.  Ayes – 2 (O’Malley, Wyland); Noes 4 (Morrissette, Brokaw, Bernard, Burchill).  MOTION FAILED.

 

MOTION by Morrissette, second by Burchill, to adopt Ordinance 6-09.

 

     Bernard again requested that rental units be included on a map for review.  Mayor Knudson noted that changes can be made to the ordinance at any time.  O’Malley indicated it would be easier to correct concerns prior to passage.

 

     Brokaw asked Police Chief Jensen for his opinion and thoughts on the ordinance.  Chief Jensen stated that at the present time, there have been no issues with any of the registered offenders in the community. He thought the child restriction zones were a good idea and may help policing efforts in this area of concern.  He noted that the Department of Corrections already works with local police in establishing residences for offenders.  The residency zones might be a challenge to enforce in the event an individual is not placed through the Wisconsin Corrections System.  He cited a recent example of a Minnesota offender who moved into the community and wasn’t immediately identified.  Chief Jensen reiterated his support for the child safety zones.  He reported he was comfortable with the residency zones undergoing further review and, at the present time, based on the offenders placed in the City, didn’t know whether residency zones were necessary.  Wyland discussed two individuals who were being considered for release.  Chief Jensen indicated that one will not be released, and the other still has not found a suitable residence and would likely remain incarcerated at the St. Croix County jail until a place was found for him to live. 

 

     Brokaw asked if the child safety zones could be separated from the residency restriction zones in the current document, and if the Council could vote only on the child safety zones this evening.  Mayor Knudson expressed his support for residency zones, stated they should be crafted so that offenders don’t leave the registration system.  Attorney Munkittrick stated that removing that large a section of the ordinance would require a new first reading.  O’Malley that the ordinance should be crafted correctly the first time to make sure the children in the community are protected against an offender going underground.  Morrissette asked whether the ordinance could be approved this evening and make changes next month.  Attorney Munkittrick stated that wasn’t good practice.  Bernard again requested to have rentals included on a map, and to show how the 150 and 200 foot residency restrictions zones would appear.  Mayor Knudson noted that several different distances were considered and that one should be found that works and is defensible.

 

     The vote was taken on the motion to adopt Ordinance No. 6-09.  Ayes - 2 (Morrissette and  Burchill); Noes - 4 (Brokaw, Bernard, Wyland, and  O’Malley).  MOTION FAILED.

 

     MOTION by O’Malley, second by Wyland, to direct the City Attorney to redraft the ordinance to delete all residency restrictions and to provide Council with a child safety zone ordinance at the June 1 meeting.  All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.

 

     MOTION by O’Malley, second by Brokaw, to send the residency restriction language and maps back to the Public Safety Committee, and to have the committee work with Darnold and city staff to develop options for the residency restriction zones, as discussed at the meeting.  All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.

 

annual compliance maintenance report for wastewater treatment plant - Resolution No. 5-09.   MOTION by Wyland, second by O’Malley, to suspend the rules toward adoption of Resolution No. 5-09.  Roll call vote, Ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED. 

 

     Further discussion of the pharmaceuticals issue took place.  Wastewater Director Schreiber said that some reach the system through digested waste, but the industry is working on reducing the direct dumping of pharmaceuticals into the system.  Disposal locations are being developed. Current wastewater standards do not exist.  The best method for disposal is incineration.  Council discussed whether this was something that could be looked at as part of the City’s sustainability efforts.

 

MOTION by O’Malley, second by Burchill, to adopt the following:

 

RESOLUTION NO. 5-09

APPROVING THE COMPLIANCE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE REPORT

DATED APRIL 27, 2009

(Copy on file in Clerk’s office)

 

The Council congratulated the Wastewater Department on another perfect score for operations of the treatment facility.

 

All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED.

 

     COMMUNICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAYOR:  Mayor Knudson read the proclamations regarding Emerald Ash Borer Awareness Week, EMS Week, and Public Works Week.

 

     COMMUNICATIONS AND ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS:  Brokaw requested that the issues related to medications in the groundwater and wastewater be further investigated.  Mayor Knudson requested that this be referred to the Public Works Committee.

 

     Darnold noted that he had provided a draft of the City’s Comprehensive Plan for review by the Council.  Chief Jensen noted that the 2009 Police Department Annual Report was provided this evening.  Knudson asked that this be placed on the next agenda for further comment.

 

     MOTION by O’Malley, second by Brokaw, to adjourn.  All ayes (6), MOTION CARRIED at 9:33 p.m.

 

Devin J. Willi, City Administrator

 

     I hereby certify that the City Administrator has submitted the foregoing minutes to me, and I hereby by my signature approve said minutes and all acts of the Common Council as sent forth therein.

  

Dean Knudson, Mayor